Payment of a Monetary Settlement in Tax Offenses
Exposure to criminal investigation by the Tax Authority or the filing of an indictment for tax offenses are complex situations with significant personal, economic, and legal ramifications. Alongside the ordinary adjudication proceedings in the courts, Israeli law offers an alternative mechanism that enables closure of the criminal proceeding in exchange for a monetary payment – the monetary settlement mechanism. This guide consolidates the principal legal provisions, procedures, and tactical considerations essential to understanding the subject of tax settlement payments.
What Is a Monetary Settlement in Tax Offenses and Where Does It Originate?
The monetary settlement mechanism is grounded in primary legislation that grants the Tax Authority the power to terminate criminal proceedings against a person suspected or accused of committing a tax offense, in exchange for a monetary sum imposed upon that person:
-
Income Tax: Regulated under Section 221 of the Income Tax Ordinance.
-
Value Added Tax (VAT): Regulated under Section 121 of the VAT Law.
The imposition of the monetary settlement constitutes, in effect, a conversion of the criminal proceeding (which may culminate in actual imprisonment or a severe criminal fine) into an administrative monetary sanction, thereby sparing the suspect or accused the conduct of a protracted criminal trial.
How Does the Application Process for a Monetary Settlement Operate?
The procedure for obtaining a monetary settlement comprises three principal stages:
-
Submission of the Application: The suspect or accused (ordinarily through a lawyer specializing in tax law) submits a formal application for payment of a monetary settlement.
-
Recommendation of the Investigating Authority: The application is first forwarded to the investigating unit that handled the case (such as the Investigations Assessment Officer or VAT Investigations), which formulates its position and recommendation regarding closure of the case by means of a monetary settlement.
-
Decision of the Monetary Settlement Committee: The application and the recommendation of the investigating authority are forwarded to the authorized Monetary Settlement Committee. The Committee considers the application in accordance with specific criteria (severity of the offense, amount of tax, personal circumstances, criminal record, etc.) and renders a final decision.
When Is It Advisable to Request a Monetary Settlement? The Tactical Risk of “Initial Admission”
An application for payment of a monetary settlement may be submitted at any stage – both during the investigation proceeding (before its conclusion) and after an indictment has already been filed. However, the timing of the application is of critical significance.
Legal Warning: Submitting an application for a monetary settlement at too early a stage (such as in the midst of the criminal investigation) may severely prejudice the suspect’s defense. The very offer to pay a monetary settlement may be perceived as an **”initial admission of guilt”** in the criminal sphere, and may be taken into account as evidence against the suspect if the settlement application is withdrawn. Additionally, the offer may serve as an admission in the context of civil assessment proceedings as well.
Accordingly, it is of decisive importance to consult with a lawyer who will first examine the evidentiary materials and only thereafter determine the precise timing for submission of the application.
How Much Does a Tax Settlement Cost?
Where the Monetary Settlement Committee grants the application, it determines the monetary sum that the applicant must pay.
-
Customary Settlement Rate: As a rule, the settlement amount in recent years has stood at approximately 30% of the unpaid tax amount (the tax amount withheld from the public treasury).
-
Payment of the Civil Debt: Payment of the criminal monetary settlement does not exempt from repayment of the original tax debt. The suspect must settle payment of the civil tax debt (including interest, linkage, and penalties) in addition to the settlement amount.
Does Payment of a Monetary Settlement Erase the Criminal Record?
Payment of the monetary settlement prevents a criminal conviction in court, but does not entirely erase the act or omission on account of which the proceedings were initiated.
-
Undertaking to Refrain from Offense: The Monetary Settlement Committee is authorized to condition closure of the case upon the suspect’s provision of a formal undertaking to refrain from committing an additional tax offense for a period to be determined (up to 3 years).
-
Entry in the Criminal Register: An order concerning an undertaking to refrain from offense is included in the criminal register pursuant to the Criminal Register and Rehabilitation of Offenders Law. Accordingly, the details of a person who pays a monetary settlement may appear in police/criminal register records within this framework.
Summary Table: Advantages versus Disadvantages of Paying a Monetary Settlement
| Parameter | Advantages | Disadvantages/Risks |
| Legal Outcome | Prevention of actual imprisonment and closure of the criminal case | Does not erase the commission of the act itself |
| Legal Proceeding | Savings in time, trial costs, and public reputational damage | Settlement amount is added to the civil tax payment |
| Timing of Submission | Possibility of closing the case while still at the investigation stage | Submission too early may be regarded as an “initial admission of guilt” |
| Criminal Record | Avoidance of criminal conviction in court | The order may appear in the criminal register (in the case of an undertaking) |
Summary and Practical Recommendations
Payment of a monetary settlement in tax offenses is an effective and important instrument that enables suspects and accused persons to conclude a complex criminal proceeding without conviction in court and without imprisonment penalties. However, this is a procedure that entails considerable evidentiary and economic risks. Before submitting an application to the Monetary Settlement Committee, it is advisable to examine the evidentiary strength of the case, the amount of the tax debt, and the proper timing for submission of the application under professional legal guidance.
Legal Disclaimer: The information in this article is intended for general knowledge only and does not constitute legal or tax advice or a substitute for individual consultation. The author bears no responsibility for any damage arising from use of the content, and one should consult a specialist lawyer before taking any action.
